After nearly eight years, the dispute between the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) and the owners of the Beloftebos wedding venue has come to a close. The settlement has been made an order of the Equality Court. Many are calling it a landmark ruling.
It is not. A settlement made an order of court resolves a dispute between two parties. It does not declare what the law is.
No court heard full evidence.
No court ruled on the constitutional question.
The settlement uses the legal phrase prima facie, meaning
"on the face of it." It expressly leaves open whether conduct rooted in sincerely held religious convictions may, in appropriate circumstances, be protected under our Constitution.
The deeper question, how South Africa holds equality and religious freedom together, has not been answered. It still awaits a court prepared to engage with it fully. The constitutional conversation is therefore not over. It has hardly begun.
To understand the issue more fully:
- Watch the full video here.
- Read the full op-ed here.
Coexistence is not the absence of disagreement. It is the discipline of living together respectfully across difference, and doing so before the next dispute reaches court.
MICHAEL SWAIN
Executive Director
Freedom of Religion South Africa (FOR SA)